Product Description
The some-more scholarship tells us about the world, the foreigner it looks. Ever given production initial penetrated the atom, early in this century, what it found there has stood as the in advance as well as unanswered plea to many of the many loving conceptions of nature. It has literally been called in to subject given afterwards either or not there have been regularly design counts of actuality about the locale of subatomic particles, or about the locations of tables as well as chairs, or even a… More >>
Quantum Mechanics as well as Experience
Related posts:
- MUG WHITE ” IF TOUCH FOOTBALL WERE EASY, IT WOULD BE CALLED QUANTUM MECHANICS ” SPORTS
- T-SHIRT MENS WHITE ” IF TOUCH FOOTBALL WERE EASY, IT WOULD BE CALLED QUANTUM MECHANICS ” SPORTS LARGE
- T-SHIRT MENS WHITE ” IF HARE COURSING WERE EASY, IT WOULD BE CALLED QUANTUM MECHANICS ” SPORTS LARGE
- T-SHIRT MENS WHITE ” IF AUTO RACING WERE EASY, IT WOULD BE CALLED QUANTUM MECHANICS ” SPORTS LARGE
- T-SHIRT MENS WHITE ” IF TRACK AND FIELD WERE EASY, IT WOULD BE CALLED QUANTUM MECHANICS ” SPORTS LARGE
This author appears on the cult promotional video What the Bleep, which was produced by the Ramtha people who believe that a woman is channeling a 35,000 year old cromagnon warrior.
Alberts appears on the film, emphatically waving his hands and talking about physics, which seemed to suggest that somehow our thoughts can influence external reality and its outcome.
How can you trust a man that then appears on such a cult film?
Maybe Alberts was duped and his sayings were taken out of context. But then this speaks of a vainglorious man that was more concerned for getting his image and notions “out there” and seemingly not particular who was doing it or not checking what the film was really about. It would not be surprisig then how such a man can get fooled and have that vanity used against him.
Either way, be careful, as this man seems too zanny to really know what he is talking about and plus his writing style in the book looks like some retarded monkey on crack was sitting in front of the typewritter.
Rating: 1 / 5
What the Bleep is NOT “cult” film, and I wonder if the person who used that term even knows what it means or watched the movie “What the Bleep Do We Know”.
Succinctly, “What the Bleep” is the greatest film ever made. The fact that Albert disagrees with the filmakers detracts from, and does not add to, his credibility.
Anything that finally attempts to unravel the fabric of deceit and brainwashing that western organized religion has propogated onto the populace is a refreshing addition to our culture and should be required viewing for the entire race.
Also, to the reviewer who mocked JZ Knight and Ramtha: JZ and Ramtha are the real thing. The channeling has been put through an endless battery of scientific tests in an attempt to debunk the phenomenon and the results proved just the opposite: what JZ is doing is real and cannot be explained away as hoax. While channelling, Ramtha/JZ’s brainwaves are in DELTA WHILE SHE IS CONSCIOUS – which is scientifically impossible for a human being to do. No other human being has ever accomplished this, and the scientists were forced to conclude that Ramtha “is a non-local phenomenon”.
Anyone who viewed “What the Bleep” with skepticism or disdain is obviously one of the many who have been brainwashed by western religion to the point of being so closed minded that they cannot even recognize enlightenment and true knowledge when they see it. It is not “occult” – it is TRUTH backed by science and quantum mechanics. Period.
Jonathan Meadows
Rating: 4 / 5
The author does not explain anything in a way that can be understood. Sometimes his explanations conflict or contradict each other throughout the chapters. There were also many mathematical errors throughout the book. You begin to wonder if the author really knows what he is writing about – or if it was meant as some big joke on the reader. I would not recommend this book to anyone.
Rating: 1 / 5
This book is so horrifically flawed on so many levels. First, there is the erroneous uncritical thinking involved in dealing with the measurement problem, which despite David’s attempt to address, is completely evaded via a multi-layered philosophical detours of an almost paramastabatory nature. Second, on a technical writing level, David is completely unable to formulate one complete, coherent, and logically cohesive sentence. His writing style is to riddled with repeated mistakes in basic grammar that it is genuinely embarrassing to read.
I would greatly encourage those interested in real science to read The Fabric of the Cosmos or The Elegant Universe.
-B. Greene
Rating: 1 / 5
The problem with this book is that the author jumps around from topic to topic, never fully explaining anything in particular. He never makes a single point that is worth remembering. The topics he does try to explain, such as superposition, are discussed in a very confusing and inconsistant manner. At times he sounds like he is talking to a grade school child, explaining elementary points in painful detail, then in the next paragraph he jumps to mathematical descriptions that only a Ph.D physicist would comprehend. It’s really bizarre. In the end you feel like you’ve read 200 pages but gained absolutely nothing. It’s like eating cotton candy, it looks impressive at first, but it disolves to nothing when you actually partake of it.
Rating: 1 / 5